中南林业科技大学学报

丹霞山世界自然遗产地生态系统服务对区域可持续发展的效应研究

PDF下载

汤辉 , 郭意 , 陈梦玥

中南林业科技大学学报 | 生态学 2026,46(9): 140-152

收起

中南林业科技大学学报 |生态学 2026 , 46 (9) : 140 -152

丹霞山世界自然遗产地生态系统服务对区域可持续发展的效应研究

全屏

[Author(id=1322924699721805826, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, orderNo=0, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=baketys@163.com, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1322924699788914692, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, authorId=1322924699721805826, language=EN, stringName=Hui Tang, firstName=Hui, middleName=null, lastName=Tang, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=School of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1322924699856023557, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, authorId=1322924699721805826, language=CN, stringName=汤辉, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=华南农业大学　林学与风景园林学院，广东　广州　510642, bio={"content":"

汤辉（baketys@163.com），副教授，博士，硕士研究生导师。

"}, bioImg=null, bioContent=

汤辉（baketys@163.com），副教授，博士，硕士研究生导师。

, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1322924699604366335, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1322924699612754944, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, companyId=1322924699604366335, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=School of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1322924699621142528, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, companyId=1322924699604366335, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=华南农业大学　林学与风景园林学院，广东　广州　510642)])]), Author(id=1322924699927326727, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, orderNo=1, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=selene390@scau.edu.cn, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=1, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1322924699994435593, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, authorId=1322924699927326727, language=EN, stringName=Yi Guo, firstName=Yi, middleName=null, lastName=Guo, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=School of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1322924700048961546, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, authorId=1322924699927326727, language=CN, stringName=郭意, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=华南农业大学　林学与风景园林学院，广东　广州　510642, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1322924699604366335, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1322924699612754944, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, companyId=1322924699604366335, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=School of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1322924699621142528, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, companyId=1322924699604366335, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=华南农业大学　林学与风景园林学院，广东　广州　510642)])]), Author(id=1322924700120264716, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, orderNo=2, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1322924700204150798, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, authorId=1322924700120264716, language=EN, stringName=Mengyue Chen, firstName=Mengyue, middleName=null, lastName=Chen, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=School of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1322924700267065359, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, authorId=1322924700120264716, language=CN, stringName=陈梦玥, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=华南农业大学　林学与风景园林学院，广东　广州　510642, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1322924699604366335, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1322924699612754944, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, companyId=1322924699604366335, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=School of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1322924699621142528, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1322258771877134531, articleId=1322924698790671356, companyId=1322924699604366335, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=华南农业大学　林学与风景园林学院，广东　广州　510642)])])]

汤辉, 郭意, 陈梦玥

作者信息

华南农业大学　林学与风景园林学院，广东　广州　510642

通讯作者:

郭意（selene390@scau.edu.cn），硕士，科研助理。

作者简介:

汤辉（baketys@163.com），副教授，博士，硕士研究生导师。

Effects of ecosystem services on regional sustainable development in the Danxiashan world natural heritage site

Hui Tang, Yi Guo, Mengyue Chen

Affiliations

School of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China

出版时间: 2026-09-25 doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.09.013

文章导航

摘要

收起

【目的】

揭示世界自然遗产地生态系统服务对区域可持续发展的影响、异质性特征与效应转化规律，破解遗产保护与区域高质量发展的协调难题，为世界自然遗产地可持续治理与生态产品价值实现提供科学依据。

【方法】

以丹霞山世界自然遗产地核心区及其所在的仁化县、浈江区为研究单元，基于2000—2020年5个关键时间节点的多源数据，采用InVEST模型测算4类调节与支撑服务，构建长时序游憩服务潜在供给能力评估体系与五维区域可持续发展综合指数，通过Spearman相关分析、多变量控制回归模型与稳健性检验，识别不同类型、不同尺度生态系统服务对区域可持续发展的效应。

【结果】

1）丹霞山核心区生态系统服务整体表现优于县域平均水平，调节与支撑服务长期维持稳定，核心区游憩服务潜在供给能力增幅达10.89%，高于县域的8.53%，碳储存、生境质量退化幅度亦低于县域；2）区域可持续发展水平呈显著上升趋势，综合指数由2000年的0.093提升至2020年的0.903，绝对增幅为0.810，2010年申遗成功后进入快速跃升阶段，2010—2015年5年增幅为前10年增幅的3.7倍；3）不同类型生态系统服务对区域可持续发展的效应存在显著异质性，游憩服务呈稳健正向效应，调节服务呈显著负向约束效应，产水量、土壤保持服务的效应无稳定统计显著性；4）生态系统服务对区域可持续发展的效应存在明显空间尺度差异，申遗政策对生态系统服务与区域可持续发展的耦合关系具有显著调节作用。

【结论】

世界自然遗产地生态系统服务对区域可持续发展的效应存在显著的类型异质性与尺度差异，需针对不同服务类型、不同空间单元制定差异化管理策略，完善生态价值向区域可持续发展的效应转化机制，推动遗产保护与区域可持续发展协同提升。

关键词

生态系统服务 / 自然遗产地 / 可持续发展 / InVEST模型 / 丹霞山

Abstract

收起

【Objective】

To reveal the effects and heterogeneity of ecosystem services (ES) on regional sustainable development (RSD) in world natural heritage sites, address the challenges of coordinating heritage conservation and regional high-quality development, and to provide a scientific basis for sustainable management.

【Method】

Taking the core zone of the Danxiashan world natural heritage site (a component of the China Danxia world heritage site) and its hosting Renhua County and Zhenjiang district as study units, this research utilized multi-source data across five key time points from 2000 to 2020. The InVEST model was employed to quantify four types of regulating and supporting services. Furthermore, an assessment framework for long-term time-series potential supply of recreational services and a five-dimensional comprehensive RSD index were constructed. Spearman correlation analysis, multivariate controlled regression models, and robustness tests were applied to identify the effects of different types of ES on RSD at different spatial scales.

【Result】

1) The ES performance of the Danxiashan core zone is generally better than the county-level average. Regulating and supporting services remain stable, while recreational service potential increases by 10.89% in the core zone, higher than the 8.53% at the county scale. Declines in carbon storage and habitat quality are also lower in the core zone; 2) The RSD level increases significantly, with the composite index rising from 0.093 (Year 2000) to 0.903 (Year 2020), an absolute increase of 0.810. After the 2010 world heritage inscription, the region enters a rapid growth stage, and the increase from 2010 to 2015 is 3.7 times that of the previous decade; 3) The effects of different ES on RSD are significantly heterogeneous. Recreational services show a robust positive effect, while regulating services show a significant negative constraining effect. The effects of water yield and soil conservation show no stable statistical significance on RSD; 4) Pronounced spatial scale differences exist in the effects of ES on RSD, and the world heritage inscription policy plays a significant moderating role in the coupling relationship between ES and RSD.

【Conclusion】

The effects of ES on RSD in world natural heritage sites are characterized by significant type-specific heterogeneity and spatial scale dependencies. Differentiated management strategies should be formulated according to different service types and spatial units. Improving the transformation mechanism from ecological value to RSD is essential to promote the synergistic enhancement of heritage protection and regional sustainable development.

Key words

ecosystem services / world natural heritage site / sustainable development / InVEST model / Danxiashan

引用本文

汤辉, 郭意, 陈梦玥. 丹霞山世界自然遗产地生态系统服务对区域可持续发展的效应研究. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2026 , 46 (9) : 140 -152 . DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.09.013

Hui Tang, Yi Guo, Mengyue Chen. Effects of ecosystem services on regional sustainable development in the Danxiashan world natural heritage site[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2026 , 46 (9) : 140 -152 . DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.09.013

基金

收起

国家自然科学基金面上项目(42271237)
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(23YJAZH131)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

[1]

Yao

X R

, Fang

S J

. Exploring the coupling of ecosystem services and human well-being: evidence from Chinese cities through interpretable machine learning[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2025, 180: 114315.

[2]

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis[M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005: 11-19.

[3]

Gui

Y L

, Ma

Y W

, Chen

Y M

, et al. Ecosystem services in UNESCO World Heritage sites: a review of research trends and future directions[J]. npj Heritage Science, 2026, 14: 115.

[4]

UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention[M]. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2023: 125-137.

[5]

United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development[EB/OL]. [2026-03-06]. https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/70/1.

[6]

住房和城乡建设部. 住房和城乡建设部关于印发世界自然遗产、自然与文化双遗产申报和保护管理办法(试行)的通知[EB/OL]. [2026-04-10]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2016/content_5054751.htm.

Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Notice on issuing the measures for the application and protection administration of world natural heritage and mixed cultural and natural heritage (Trial)[EB/OL]. [2026-04-10]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2016/content_5054751.htm.

[7]

陈东军, 钟林生. 生态系统服务价值评估与实现机制研究综述[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(1): 84-94.

Chen

D J

, Zhong

L S

. Review of the value evaluation and realization mechanism of ecosystem services[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023, 44(1): 84-94.

[8]

李丽, 王心源, 骆磊, 等. 生态系统服务价值评估方法综述[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(4): 1233-1245.

, Wang

X Y

, Luo

, et al. A systematic review on the methods of ecosystem services value assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(4): 1233-1245.

[9]

Daily

G C

, Postel

, Carpenter

S R

, et al. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997: 65-71.

[10]

Costanza

, D'Arge

, De Groot

, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.

[11]

谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.

Xie

G D

, Zhang

C X

, Zhang

L M

, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.

[12]

欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算：概念、核算方法与案例研究[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761.

Ouyang

Z Y

, Zhu

C Q

, Yang

G B

, et al. Gross ecosystem product: concept, accounting framework and case study[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761.

[13]

傅伯杰, 于丹丹, 吕楠. 中国生物多样性与生态系统服务评估指标体系[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(2): 341-348.

B J

, Yu

D D

, Lyu

. An indicator system for biodiversity and ecosystem services evaluation in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(2): 341-348.

[14]

游惠明, 黄思忠, 谭芳林, 等. 福建泉州湾自然保护区生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(7): 83-88.

You

H M

, Huang

S Z

, Tan

F L

, et al. Values of ecosystem services at Quanzhou bay nature reserve of Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2018, 38(7): 83-88.

[15]

李昂, 杨琰瑛, 师荣光, 等. 居民福祉及其与生态系统服务的关系研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(5): 948-957.

, Yang

Y Y

, Shi

R G

, et al. Research progress on human well-being and its relationship with ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2022, 39(5): 948-957.

[16]

巩芳, 王玉文, 马云翔. 草原生态系统服务价值、草牧产业与居民福祉耦合协调关系时空演变研究：草原生态补奖视角下[J]. 内蒙古科技与经济, 2025(19): 1-13, 33.

Gong

, Wang

Y W

, Ma

Y X

. Research on the spatial and temporal evolution of the coupling and coordination relationship between grassland ecosystem service value, grassland animal husbandry industry and residents' well-being: from the perspective of grassland ecological compensation and subsidy[J]. Inner Mongolia Science Technology & Economy, 2025(19): 1-13, 33.

[17]

Maharja

, Praptiwi

R A

, Sainal

, et al. Multiple negative impacts of marine plastic pollution on tropical coastal ecosystem services, and human health and well-being[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2024, 258: 107423.

[18]

武燕, 吴映梅, 高彬嫔, 等. 滇中城市群生态系统服务与人类福祉时空耦合及影响因素研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2025, 44(3): 135-145, 174.

, Wu

Y M

, Gao

B P

, et al. Spatio-temporal coupling and influencing factors of ecosystem services and human well-being in the central Yunnan urban agglomeration[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2025, 44(3): 135-145, 174.

[19]

刘迪, 郭琳, 陈海, 等. 黄河流域生态系统服务与居民福祉的多类型关系及驱动因素[J]. 水土保持研究, 2026, 33(1): 372-382, 391.

Liu

, Guo

, Chen

, et al. Multi-type relationships between ecosystem services and resident well-being and their driving factors in Yellow River basin[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2026, 33(1): 372-382, 391.

[20]

Bai

Y S

, Chen

P Y

, Ma

, et al. Do perceived and calculated ecosystem services affect residents' human well-being differently?: a comparison study in the Guanting reservoir basin, China[J]. Applied Geography, 2025, 184: 103765.

[21]

Yang

, Zhou

X P

, Gu

X K

, et al. Impact mechanism of ecosystem services on resident well-being under sustainable development goals: a case study of the Shanghai metropolitan area[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2023, 103: 107262.

[22]

徐建英, 王清, 魏建瑛. 卧龙自然保护区生态系统服务福祉贡献评估：当地居民的视角[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(20): 7348-7358.

J Y

, Wang

, Wei

J Y

. Assessment of the contribution to human well-being by ecosystem services in Wolong natural reserve from the perspective of local communities[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(20): 7348-7358.

[23]

张成虎, 刘菊, 苏宏新, 等. 自然保护区农户生态系统服务依赖度及其影响因素：基于形成型指标的结构方程模型分析[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(17): 7417-7430.

Zhang

C H

, Liu

, Su

H X

, et al. Farmers' dependency index of ecosystem services and influencing factors in nature reserves based on the structural equation model with formative indicators[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(17): 7417-7430.

[24]

闫晨雨, 张妍妍, 王耀铭, 等. 森林生态系统文化服务功能评价与发展对策：以老君山自然保护区为例[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 15(1): 110-116.

Yan

C Y

, Zhang

Y Y

, Wang

Y M

, et al. Evaluation and development countermeasure of forest ecosystem cultural service function: a case study of Laojun mountain nature reserve[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology (Social Sciences), 2021, 15(1): 110-116.

[25]

胡继然, 姚娟. 基于草地生态系统服务认知的牧民生计选择：以新疆喀拉峻天山世界自然遗产地为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(16): 6534-6542.

J R

, Yao

. Choice of herders' livelihood based on the perception of grassland ecosystem services: taking Xinjiang Kalajun Tianshan world natural heritage site as an example[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(16): 6534-6542.

[26]

廖雨辰, 史雪威, 刘俊雁, 等. 九寨沟国家级自然保护区地震前后生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(6): 2063-2073.

Liao

Y C

, Shi

X W

, Liu

J Y

, et al. Ecosystem service values assessment before and after earthquake in Jiuzhaigou national nature reserve[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(6): 2063-2073.

[27]

隋春花, 罗秋雨, 邹钰洁, 等. 利益相关者视角下世界自然遗产地生态系统文化服务的社会价值评估：以丹霞山为例[J]. 地理研究, 2025, 44(11): 3147-3164.

Sui

C H

, Luo

Q Y

, Zou

Y J

, et al. Evaluating the social value of cultural ecosystem services in a world natural heritage site: perspectives of different stakeholders at Danxiashan[J]. Geographical Research, 2025, 44(11): 3147-3164.

[28]

隋春花, 陆宏芳. 丹霞山世界自然遗产地旅游生态系统能值分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(7): 1297-1306.

Sui

C H

, Lu

H F

. An emergy analysis of the tourism ecosystem of Danxia mountain world natural heritage[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 28(7): 1297-1306.

[29]

廖祥, 杨鑫, 郭社平, 等. 生态系统服务与人类福祉的交互作用及其驱动因素：以成渝城市群为例[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(11): 7298-7315.

Liao

, Yang

, Guo

S P

, et al. Interactions and driving factors of ecosystem services and human well-being: a case study of Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration[J]. Environmental Science, 2025, 46(11): 7298-7315.

[30]

United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2014 sustaining human progress: reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience[EB/OL]. [2026-03-06]. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2014.

2026年第46卷第9期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.09.013

接收时间：2026-01-28
首发时间：2026-10-30
出版时间：2026-09-25

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2026-01-28
修回日期：2026-04-24

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目(42271237)

教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(23YJAZH131)

作者信息

华南农业大学　林学与风景园林学院，广东　广州　510642

通讯作者:

郭意（selene390@scau.edu.cn），硕士，科研助理。

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/znlykj/CN/10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.09.013

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT