铀矿冶

地浸采铀工艺数值模拟进展及电动地浸采铀工艺数值模型建立

PDF下载

柳琪 ¹ , 李春光 ¹^,² , 刘龙成 ² , 刘振中 ¹ , 张翀 ³ , 孟硕 ² , 王文吉 ²

铀矿冶 | 开采·选冶 2023,42(1): 1-9

收起

铀矿冶 |开采·选冶 2023 , 42 (1) : 1 -9

地浸采铀工艺数值模拟进展及电动地浸采铀工艺数值模型建立

全屏

柳琪¹, 李春光¹^,², 刘龙成², 刘振中¹, 张翀³, 孟硕², 王文吉²

作者信息

^1.南华大学　资源环境与安全工程学院，湖南　衡阳　421001

^2.南华大学　放射性废物处理处置与数学模型研发中心，湖南　衡阳　421001

^3.核工业北京化工冶金研究院，北京　101149

通讯作者:

李春光（1983—），女，内蒙古赤峰人，博士，副教授，主要从事溶浸采铀研究工作。

作者简介:

柳琪（2000—），女，河北衡水人，在读硕士，主要从事地浸采铀及数值模拟研究工作。

Progress of Numerical Simulation for In-situ Leaching Uranium and Establishment of Numerical Model for Electrokinetic In-situ Leaching Uranium

Qi LIU¹, Chunguang LI¹^,², Longcheng LIU², Zhenzhong LIU¹, Chong ZHANG³, Shuo MENG², Wenji WANG²

Affiliations

^1.School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China

^2.R&D Center of Radioactive Waste Treatment, Disposal and Modeling, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China

^3.Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgy, CNNC, Beijing 101149, China

出版时间: 2023-02-20 doi: 10.13426/j.cnki.yky.2022.08.03

文章导航

摘要

收起

为了将电动原地浸出（EK-ISL）技术更好地应用于低渗透性铀矿开采，提高低渗透性铀矿的浸出效率，需要借助数值模拟技术对其进行研究。从地浸采铀过程的物理化学行为出发，介绍了数值模拟技术对地浸采铀的推动作用，总结了地浸采铀模型的基本方程和求解方法，结合电动修复领域的相关数值模型分析了EK-ISL模型需要描述的关键过程，并在此基础上提出了初步的电动原地浸出采铀数值模型。

关键词

原地浸出采铀 / 电动原地浸出 / 数值模拟 / 溶质迁移

Abstract

收起

In order to better apply the electrokinetic in-situ leaching (EK-ISL) technology to the mining of low permeability uranium ore and improve the leaching efficiency of low permeability uranium ore, it is necessary to study it with numerical simulation technology. Starting from the physical and chemical behaviors in the process of in-situ leaching of uranium, the promotion of numerical simulation technology to in-situ leaching uranium were reviewed, the basic equations and solving methods of the model of in-situ leaching uranium were summarized, the key processes that need to be described by EK-ISL model were analyzed based on this, a preliminary numerical simulation model of electrokinetic in-situ leaching uranium was proposed.

Key words

in-situ leaching uranium / electrokinetic in-situ leaching / numerical simulation / solute transport

引用本文

柳琪, 李春光, 刘龙成, 刘振中, 张翀, 孟硕, 王文吉. 地浸采铀工艺数值模拟进展及电动地浸采铀工艺数值模型建立. 铀矿冶, 2023 , 42 (1) : 1 -9 . DOI: 10.13426/j.cnki.yky.2022.08.03

Qi LIU, Chunguang LI, Longcheng LIU, Zhenzhong LIU, Chong ZHANG, Shuo MENG, Wenji WANG. Progress of Numerical Simulation for In-situ Leaching Uranium and Establishment of Numerical Model for Electrokinetic In-situ Leaching Uranium[J]. Uranium Mining and Metallurgy, 2023 , 42 (1) : 1 -9 . DOI: 10.13426/j.cnki.yky.2022.08.03

基金

收起

国家自然科学基金(52204139)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

[1]

DENG Y, HOU W, WEI X H, et al. Mechanism analysis on synergistic leaching of uranium from pyrite oxidized by acidithiobacillus ferrivorans[J]. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2021, 330(3): 951-961.

[2]

WANG P, TAN K X, LI Y M, et al. Effect of pyrite on the leaching kinetics of pitchblende in the process of acid in situ leaching of uranium[J]. Minerals, 2022, 12(5): 570.

[3]

王艳. 原地浸出技术的优缺点分析和实践[J]. 世界有色金属, 2012(7): 23-25.

[4]

BHARGAVA S K, RAM R, POWNCEBY M, et al. A review of acid leaching of uraninite[J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2015, 151: 10-24.

[5]

SADYKOV M P. Development and evaluation of a mathematical model in an in situ uranium leaching technique[J]. Applied Earth Science, 2019, 128(4): 158-166. 查看文献详细信息

[6]

孙占学, ASGHAR F, 赵凯, 等. 中国铀矿采冶回顾与展望[J]. 有色金属(冶炼部分), 2021(8): 1-8.

[7]

MARTIN L, IVARS N. Through-electromigration: a new method of investigating pore connectivity and obtaining formation factors[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2006, 87(3): 237-252.

[8]

REYNOLDS D A, JONES E H, GILLEN M, et al. Electrokinetic migration of permanganate through low-permeability media[J]. Ground Water, 2008, 46(4): 629-37.

[9]

ANDRÉ M, MALMSTRÖM M E, NERETNIEKS I. Determination of sorption properties of intact rock samples: new methods based on electromigration[J]. J Contam Hydrol, 2008, 103(3): 71-81.

[10]

WEN D D, FU R B, LI Q. Removal of inorganic contaminants in soil by electrokinetic remediation technologies: a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 401: 123345.

[11]

MARTENS E, PROMMER H, DAI X W, et al. Feasibility of electrokinetic in situ leaching of gold[J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2018, 175: 70-78.

[12]

吴培生, 张宝恩, 齐静. 腐植酸对地电化学地浸采铀影响的探讨[J]. 铀矿冶, 2010, 29(3): 167-168.

[13]

樊兴, 康绍辉, 李大炳, 等. 碱性铀矿石电化学浸出技术初步研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(2): 235-239.

[14]

王兵, 罗跃, 李寻, 等. 反应动力学在地浸采铀数值模拟中的应用研究[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2022, 32(6): 1772-1781.

[15]

李金柱, 曾晟, 罗辉. 原地浸出采铀物理化学渗流实验及溶质运移模拟[D]. 衡阳: 南华大学, 2020.

[16]

In situ leach mining (ISL) of uranium-world nuclear association[EB/OL]. [2022-09-20]. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/mining-of-uranium/in-situ-leach-mining-of-uranium.aspx.

[17]

SALDAÑA M, GÁLVEZ E, ROBLES P, et al. Copper mineral leaching mathematical models——a review[J]. Materials, 2022, 15(5): 1757.

[18]

李效萌, 刘金辉, 周义朋, 等. 铀浸出水文地球化学作用研究进展[J]. 有色金属(冶炼部分), 2020(11): 71-78.

[19]

LASAGA A C, LUTTGE A. Variation of crystal dissolution rate based on a dissolution stepwave model[J]. Science, 2001, 291(5512): 2400-2404.

[20]

ALI, ABDUL-MEHDI S, LICHTNER, et al. Reactive transport of U and V from abandoned uranium mine wastes[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(21): 12385-12393.

[21]

TAVAKOLI H, MABDOLLAHY, SJAHMADI, et al. Enhancing recovery of uranium column bioleaching by process optimization and kinetic modeling[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2017, 27(12): 2691-2703.

[22]

EMBILE R F, WALDER I F, MAHONEY J J. Multicomponent reactive transport modeling of effluent chemistry using locally obtained mineral dissolution rates of forsterite and pyrrhotite from a mine tailings deposit[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2019, 128: 87-96.

[23]

MCMASTER S A, RAM R, FARIS N, et al. Uranium leaching from synthetic betafite: [(Ca, U)₂(Ti, Nb, Ta)₂O₇][J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2017, 160: 58-67.

[24]

MERKEL B J, PLANER-FRIEDRICH B. 地下水地球化学模拟的原理及应用[M]. 朱义年, 王焰新, 译. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 2005.

[25]

YEH G T, TRIPATHI V S. A critical evaluation of recent developments in hydrogeochemical transport models of reactive multichemical components[J]. Water Resources Research, 1989, 25(1): 93-108.

[26]

邱文杰, 刘正邦, 杨蕴, 等. 砂岩型铀矿CO₂+O₂地浸采铀的反应运移数值模拟[J]. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2022, 52(4): 627-638.

[27]

阙为民. 原地浸出采铀地球化学动力学模型研究[J]. 铀矿冶, 2004, 23(1): 1-8.

[28]

SIMON R B, SCHMITT J M, LAGNEAU V, et al. Kinetic reactive transport modelling of column tests for uranium In Situ Recovery (ISR) mining[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2014, 51: 116-129.

[29]

赵贺永, 肖月华. 某铀矿原地浸出U离子的GMS模拟研究[J]. 攀枝花学院学报, 2015, 32(2): 22-24.

[30]

REGNAULT O, LAGNEAU V, FIET N. 3D reactive transport simulations of uranium in situ leaching: forecast and process optimization[M]//Uranium-Past and Future Challenges. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015: 725-730.

[31]

连国玺, 李梦姣, 汤庆四, 等. 某地浸井场抽大于注比例与地下水环境影响关系的研究[J]. 铀矿冶, 2017, 36(2): 144-150.

[32]

李衡, 周义朋. 地浸采铀溶质运移研究进展及展望[J]. 稀有金属, 2019, 43(3): 319-330.

[33]

SHEN N, LI J, GUO Y F, et al. Thermodynamic modeling of in situ leaching of sandstone-type uranium minerals[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2020, 65(4): 2017-2031.

[34]

贾明涛, 金家聪, 陈梅芳, 等. 基于COMSOL-PHREEQC的砂岩型铀矿浸出性能模拟分析技术[J]. 铀矿地质, 2021, 37(4): 745-754.

[35]

林效宾, 刘红旭, 王志明, 等. 伊犁盆地蒙其古尔铀矿床水文地球化学模拟研究[J]. 铀矿地质, 2017, 33(6): 346-355.

[36]

曹振, 吉宏斌, 邢拥国, 等. PHREEQC软件在改善低渗透砂岩铀矿含矿层渗透性中的应用[J]. 铀矿冶, 2012, 31(1): 14-18.

[37]

ROSENBOM A E, THERRIEN R, REFSGAARD J C, et al. Numerical analysis of water and solute transport in variably-saturated fractured clayey till[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2009, 104(1/4): 137-152.

[38]

DAVID, RUSSO, JACOB, et al. Stochastic analysis of solute transport in partially saturated heterogeneous soil: 1. numerical experiments[J]. Water Resources Research, 1994, 30(3): 769-779.

[39]

陈茜茜. 基于反应性溶质运移的酸法地浸采铀数值模拟探讨[D]. 南昌: 东华理工大学, 2020.

[40]

ACAR Y B, ALSHAWABKEH A N. Principles of electrokinetic remediation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1993, 27(13): 2638-2647.

[41]

VILLEN-GUZMAN M, CERRILLO-GONZALEZ M, PAZ-GARCIA J M, et al. An overview of the modeling of electrokinetic remediation[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2021: 1-34.

[42]

BARAUD F, FOURCADE M C, TELLIER S, et al. Modelling of decontamination rate in an electrokinetic soil processing[J]. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 1997, 68(2): 105-121.

[43]

PAZ-GARCÍA J, JOHANNESSON B, OTTOSEN L M, et al. Modeling of electrokinetic processes by finite element integration of the Nernst-Planck-Poisson system of equations[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2011, 79(2): 183-192.

[44]

MING Z W, REYNOLDS D A, PROMMER H, et al. Numerical evaluation of voltage gradient constraints on electrokinetic injection of amendments[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2012, 38: 60-69.

[45]

ALSHAWABKEH A N, ACAR Y B. Electrokinetic remediation Ⅱ: theoretical model[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 122(3): 186-196.

[46]

ANDREW P S, RONALD F P. Removal of contaminants from saturated clay by electroosmosis[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 27(2): 283-291.

[47]

ACAR Y B, ALSHAWABKEH A N, GALE R J. Fundamentals of extracting species from soils by electrokinetics[J]. Waste Management, 1993, 13(2): 141-151.

[48]

SPROCATI R, MASI M, MUNIRUZZAMAN M, et al. Modeling electrokinetic transport and biogeochemical reactions in porous media: a multidimensional Nernst-Planck-Poisson approach with PHREEQC coupling[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2019, 127: 134-147.

[49]

JACOB B. Hydraulics of groundwater[M]. New York: Dover Publications Inc., 2007.

[50]

NEWMAN J, BALSARA N P. Electrochemical systems[M].4th ed. New York: Wiley, 2021.

[51]

RASOULI P, STEEFEL C I, MAYER K U, et al. Benchmarks for multicomponent diffusion and electrochemical migration[J]. Computational Geosciences, 2015, 19(3): 523-533.

[52]

MARTENS E, PROMMER H N, SPROCATI R, et al. Toward a more sustainable mining future with electrokinetic in situ leaching[J]. Science Advances, 2021, 7(18).

[53]

SPROCATI R, ROLLE M. Charge interactions, reaction kinetics and dimensionality effects on electrokinetic remediation: a model-based analysis[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2019, 229(1): 103567.

[54]

SPROCATI R, ROLLE M. On the interplay between electromigration and electroosmosis during electrokinetic transport in heterogeneous porous media[J]. Water Research, 2022, 213: 118161.

[55]

ROLLE M, SPROCATI R, MASI M, et al. Nernst-planck-based description of transport, coulombic interactions, and geochemical reactions in porous media: modeling approach and benchmark experiments[J]. Water Resources Research, 2018, 54(4): 3176-3195.

[56]

MUNIRUZZAMAN M, ROLLE M. Multicomponent ionic transport modeling in physically and electrostatically heterogeneous porous media with PhreeqcRM coupling for geochemical reactions[J]. Water Resources Research, 2019, 55(12): 11121-11143.

[57]

PARKHURST D L WISSMEIER L. PhreeqcRM: a reaction module for transport simulators based on the geochemical model PHREEQC[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2015, 83: 176-189.

2023年第42卷第1期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.13426/j.cnki.yky.2022.08.03

接收时间：2022-08-27
首发时间：2026-10-23
出版时间：2023-02-20

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2022-08-27

基金

国家自然科学基金(52204139)

作者信息

^1.南华大学　资源环境与安全工程学院，湖南　衡阳　421001

^2.南华大学　放射性废物处理处置与数学模型研发中心，湖南　衡阳　421001

^3.核工业北京化工冶金研究院，北京　101149

通讯作者:

李春光（1983—），女，内蒙古赤峰人，博士，副教授，主要从事溶浸采铀研究工作。

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/yky/CN/10.13426/j.cnki.yky.2022.08.03

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT