技术经济

网络动态与创新：结构洞与封闭网络之间的结构转型

PDF下载

王泽宇 , 闫岩 , 沈子杰 , 梁智野

技术经济 | 青年探索 2026,45(8): 116-133

收起

技术经济 |青年探索 2026 , 45 (8) : 116 -133

网络动态与创新：结构洞与封闭网络之间的结构转型

全屏

[Author(id=1322239997797847301, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, orderNo=0, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1322239997877539079, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, authorId=1322239997797847301, language=EN, stringName=Zeyu Wang, firstName=Zeyu, middleName=null, lastName=Wang, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=School of Business, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1322239997957230856, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, authorId=1322239997797847301, language=CN, stringName=王泽宇, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=中国人民大学商学院，北京 100872, bio={"content":"

王泽宇（1998—），中国人民大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向：社会网络；

"}, bioImg=null, bioContent=

王泽宇（1998—），中国人民大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向：社会网络；

, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1322239997701378305, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1322239997709766914, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, companyId=1322239997701378305, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=School of Business, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1322239997722349827, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, companyId=1322239997701378305, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=中国人民大学商学院，北京 100872)])]), Author(id=1322239998015951114, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, orderNo=1, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=1, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1322239998078865676, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, authorId=1322239998015951114, language=EN, stringName=Yan Yan, firstName=Yan, middleName=null, lastName=Yan, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=School of Business, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1322239998145974541, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, authorId=1322239998015951114, language=CN, stringName=闫岩, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=中国人民大学商学院，北京 100872, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1322239997701378305, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1322239997709766914, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, companyId=1322239997701378305, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=School of Business, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1322239997722349827, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, companyId=1322239997701378305, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=中国人民大学商学院，北京 100872)])]), Author(id=1322239998217277711, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, orderNo=2, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1322239998292775185, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, authorId=1322239998217277711, language=EN, stringName=Zijie Shen, firstName=Zijie, middleName=null, lastName=Shen, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=School of Business, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1322239998351495442, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146120045056339983, articleId=1322239996787020030, authorId=1322239998217277711, language=CN, stringName=沈子杰, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=中国人民大学商学院，北京 100872, bio={"content":"

沈子杰（1996—），中国人民大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向：创新管理；

"}, bioImg=null, bioContent=

沈子杰（1996—），中国人民大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向：创新管理；

梁智野（1998—），中国人民大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向：创新管理。

"}, bioImg=null, bioContent=

梁智野（1998—），中国人民大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向：创新管理。

王泽宇, 闫岩, 沈子杰, 梁智野

作者信息

中国人民大学商学院，北京 100872

通讯作者:

闫岩（1987—），博士，中国人民大学商学院副教授，研究方向：社会网络，创新管理；

作者简介:

王泽宇（1998—），中国人民大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向：社会网络；

沈子杰（1996—），中国人民大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向：创新管理；

梁智野（1998—），中国人民大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向：创新管理。

Network Dynamics and Innovation: Network Structure Transitions between Structural Holes and Closure Networks

Zeyu Wang, Yan Yan, Zijie Shen, Zhiye Liang

Affiliations

School of Business, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

出版时间: 2026-08-25 doi: 10.12404/j.issn.1002-980X.J26040312

文章导航

摘要

收起

现有研究多从静态视角分别考察结构洞与封闭网络对组织创新绩效的独立影响，但此类研究忽视了企业在不同网络结构之间进行动态配置的过程。本文基于注意力基础观，将网络结构转型视为一种注意力再分配过程，探讨企业在结构洞与封闭网络之间的转型程度如何影响其创新绩效。企业可用于信息处理与决策的认知资源有限，无法同时关注网络中的全部信息。然而，企业需要在不同网络结构之间进行有选择的注意力配置，因此企业会在不同创新阶段于结构洞与封闭网络之间进行战略性切换，从而形成一种“双元”的网络转型模式。具体而言，探索式创新依赖异质知识获取，因此企业需在结构洞与封闭网络间持续转型以维持多元知识接入并促进探索；而利用式创新依赖知识深化，频繁转型则会削弱关系强度并阻碍学习，从而产生负面影响。基于对784家美国生物制药企业自1998年起15年专利合作序列的纵向分析，并采用最优匹配方法，研究发现，高转型程度显著提升探索式创新，但抑制利用式创新。此外，合作伙伴的网络特征也对上述关系具有调节作用。本文从动态网络构型与注意力配置的视角，拓展了网络与创新研究。

关键词

网络动态 / 结构洞 / 封闭网络 / 探索式创新与利用式创新 / 最优匹配分析

Abstract

收起

While existing studies examine how structural holes or closure networks independently affect organizational innovation performance, this body of work remains constrained by static and singular perspectives. The temporal dynamics of network structure transitions in R&D collaborations are examined. It is argued that organizations strategically transition between structural hole and closure networks across different phases of the innovation process, thereby forming an ambidextrous network transition pattern. Drawing on longitudinal network data from 784 U.S. biopharmaceutical firms and patent collaboration sequences spanning 15 years from 1998 onward, optimal matching analysis is employed to identify network transition patterns. The findings indicate that firms exhibiting a higher degree of transition between structural hole and closure networks achieve greater exploratory innovation but at the expense of exploitative innovation. Furthermore, the moderating roles of two partner network characteristics-tie stability and network status-are examined. By adopting a dynamic configurational perspective on network evolution, this research extends the literature on interorganizational networks and innovation while offering practical implications for managing collaborative innovation.

Key words

network dynamics / structural holes / closure networks / exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation / optimal matching analysis

引用本文

王泽宇, 闫岩, 沈子杰, 梁智野. 网络动态与创新：结构洞与封闭网络之间的结构转型. 技术经济, 2026 , 45 (8) : 116 -133 . DOI: 10.12404/j.issn.1002-980X.J26040312

Zeyu Wang, Yan Yan, Zijie Shen, Zhiye Liang. Network Dynamics and Innovation: Network Structure Transitions between Structural Holes and Closure Networks[J]. Journal of Technology Economics, 2026 , 45 (8) : 116 -133 . DOI: 10.12404/j.issn.1002-980X.J26040312

基金

收起

国家自然科学基金项目“基于间接知识泄露的创新网络防御研究”(72374200)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

[1]

BRÄNDLE L, BERGER E S C, HOWARD M D. Crossing technological boundaries: Brokerage and the emergence of innovation networks[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2025, 68(3): 620-647.

[2]

WANG K, DONG Y. The co-evolution of internal knowledge characteristics of cities and external technology transfer: Based on a cross-level network perspective[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2026, 51: 1510-1535.

[3]

LIU Y, YU Q, LI J. The impact of knowledge attributes and life cycle on the evolution of emerging technology innovation network: A TERGM analysis[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2024, 29(2): 639-662.

[4]

ZHANG B, YIN X, XIONG J, et al. The evolution of complex global innovation collaboration network: A multilevel analysis of a CoPS industry 2001—2020[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2025, 72: 1039-1051.

[5]

AHUJA G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45(3): 425-455.

[6]

BURT R S. Structural holes[M] . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.

[7]

BUSKENS V, VAN DE RIJT A. Dynamics of networks if everyone strives for structural holes[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2008, 114(2): 371-407.

[8]

BAUM J A, MCEVILY B, ROWLEY T J. Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(2): 529-546.

[9]

SODA G, ZAHEER A, SUN X, et al. Brokerage evolution in innovation contexts: Formal structure, network neighborhoods and knowledge[J]. Research Policy, 2021, 50(10): 104343.

[10]

BURT R S, MERLUZZI J. Network oscillation[J]. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2016, 2(4): 368-391.

[11]

JACOBSEN D H, STEA D, SODA G. Intraorganizational network dynamics: Past progress, current challenges, and new frontiers[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2022, 16(2): 853-897.

[12]

SODA G, MANNUCCI P V, BURT R S. Networks, creativity, and time: Staying creative through brokerage and network rejuvenation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2021, 64(4): 1164-1190.

[13]

ZHANG Z, LUO T. Network capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations: From the perspective of network dynamics[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 152: 119910.

[14]

夏芸，马硕，魏田苡薇，等．技术创新的催化剂：差异化战略——动态网络能力与数字化转型桥梁与变革机制［J］．技术经济，2024，43 （2）：92-105．

[15]

GUO M, YANG N, WANG J, et al. How do structural holes promote network expansion?[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 173: 121129.

[16]

FLEMING L, KING C, JUDA A I. Small worlds and regional innovation[J]. Organization Science, 2007, 18(6): 938-954.

[17]

HARGADON A, SUTTON R I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(4): 716-749.

[18]

FLEMING L, WAGUESPACK D M. Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities[J]. Organization Science, 2007, 18(2): 165-180.

[19]

KAPLAN S, VAKILI K. The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(10): 1435-1457.

[20]

RHEE L, LEONARDI P M. Which pathway to good ideas? An attention-based view of innovation in social networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(4): 1188-1215.

[21]

JANSEN J J, VAN DEN BOSCH F A, VOLBERDA H W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(11): 1661-1674.

[22]

YAN Y, GUAN J. Social capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations: The mediating roles of ego-network dynamics[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 126: 244-258.

[23]

李振东，梅亮，朱子钦，等．制造业单项冠军企业数字创新战略及其适配组态研究［J］．管理世界，2023，39（2）：186-208．

[24]

SODA G, TORTORIELLO M, IORIO A. Harvesting value from brokerage: Individual strategic orientation, structural holes, and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2018, 61(3): 896-918.

[25]

王硕，王嘉杰，张子涵，等．发明家流动创新连续性对团队探索式创新的影响研究：基于专利数据的分析［J］．信息资源管理学报，2026，16（2）：98-110．

[26]

COLEMAN J S. Social capital in the creation of human capital[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94: S95-S120.

[27]

REAGANS R, ZUCKERMAN E W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams[J]. Organization Science, 2001, 12(4): 502-517.

[28]

ROWLEY T, BEHRENS D, KRACKHARDT D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3): 369-386.

[29]

HANSEN M T, PODOLNY J M, PFEFFER J. So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on corporate social capital in organizations[C]//PODOLNY J M, PAGE K L. Social capital of organizations. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2001: 21-57.

[30]

ARAL S, VAN ALSTYNE M. The diversity-bandwidth trade-off[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2011, 117(1): 90-171.

[31]

DANNEELS E. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(12): 1095-1121.

[32]

WEN J, QUALLS W J, ZENG D. To explore or exploit: The influence of inter-firm R&D network diversity and structural holes on innovation outcomes[J]. Technovation, 2021, 100: 102178.

[33]

GRANOVETTER M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6): 1360-1380.

[34]

KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A. On the psychology of prediction[J]. Psychological Review, 1973, 80(4): 237-251.

[35]

LEANA C R, VAN BUREN H J. Organizational social capital and employment practices[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(3): 538-555.

[36]

DLOUHY K, BIEMANN T. Optimal matching analysis in career research: A review and some best-practice recommendations[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2015, 90: 163-173.

[37]

ELZINGA C H, LIEFBROER A C. De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: A cross-national comparison using sequence analysis[J]. European Journal of Population, 2007, 23: 225-250.

[38]

LIEFBROER A C, ELZINGA C H. Intergenerational transmission of behavioural patterns: How similar are parents' and children's demographic trajectories?[J]. Advances in Life Course Research, 2012, 17(1): 1-10.

[39]

CHEN H, MEHRA A, TASSELLI S, BORGATTI S P. Network dynamics and organizations: A review and research agenda[J]. Journal of Management, 2022, 48(6): 1602-1660.

[40]

KWON S W, RONDI E, LEVIN D Z, et al. Network brokerage: An integrative review and future research agenda[J]. Journal of Management, 2020, 46(6): 1092-1120.

[41]

SIMMEL G. The sociology of georg simmel[M] . New York: Simon and Schuster, 1950.

[42]

BIDWELL M, FERNANDEZ-MATEO I. Relationship duration and returns to brokerage in the staffing sector[J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21(6): 1141-1158.

[43]

刘海兵，夏长衎．数字平台生态系统如何赋能资源编排能力——结构洞的中介作用［J］．技术经济，2025，44（3）：97-110．

[44]

王慧，高山行，杨张博．战略联盟网络嵌入层次对企业技术创新的影响研究［J］．科研管理，2025，46（11）：32-41．

[45]

STOVEL K, SHAW L. Brokerage[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2012, 38(1): 139-158.

[46]

KATILA R, AHUJA G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(6): 1183-1194.

[47]

PERRY-SMITH J E. Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(1): 85-101.

[48]

TAYLOR A, GREVE H R. Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4): 723-740.

[49]

ZOLLO M, WINTER S G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities[J]. Organization Science, 2002, 13(3): 339-351.

[50]

AHUJA G, SODA G, ZAHEER A. The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(2): 434-448.

[51]

杨林，徐培栋．有无相生：数字化背景下“专精特新”单项冠军企业双元创新的前因组态及其效应研究［J］．南开管理评论，2024，27 （2）：137-151．

[52]

CARNABUCI G, OPERTI E. Where do firms' recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms' ability to innovate through technological recombination[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(13): 1591-1613.

[53]

NOOTEBOOM B. Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance[J]. Journal of Management and Governance, 2000, 4: 69-92.

[54]

GUAN J C, YAN Y. Technological proximity and recombinative innovation in the alternative energy field[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(7): 1460-1473.

[55]

KAHNEMAN D. Attention and effort[M] . Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

[56]

BURT R S. Structural holes and good ideas[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2004, 110(2): 349-399.

[57]

齐莹莹，周立军．开放式创新、独占机制与战略性新兴产业主导设计——双元创新的中介效应［J］．技术经济，2025，44（7）：40-50．

[58]

TANRIVERDI H, VENKATRAMAN N. Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(2): 97-119.

[59]

魏江，徐蕾．知识网络双重嵌入、知识整合与集群企业创新能力［J］．管理科学学报，2014，17（2）：34-47．

[60]

FLEMING L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(1): 117-132.

[61]

OPPENHEIMER D M. The secret life of fluency[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2008, 12(6): 237-241.

[62]

BRESCHI S, LISSONI F, MALERBA F. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(1): 69-87.

[63]

BURT R S. Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal[M] . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

[64]

WANG Y, ZHANG J, YAN Y, et al. The bidirectional causality of tie stability and innovation performance[J]. Research Policy, 2024, 53(10): 105102.

[65]

LIN R, LU Y, ZHOU C, et al. Rethinking individual technological innovation: Cooperation network stability and the contingent effect of knowledge network attributes[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 144: 366-376.

[66]

TORTORIELLO M, KRACKHARDT D. Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(1): 167-181.

[67]

MCFADYEN M A, CANNELLA JR A A. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(5): 735-746.

[68]

陈劲，陈钰芬．开放创新体系与企业技术创新资源配置［J］．科研管理，2006（3）：1-8．

[69]

曾德明，张志东，赵胜超．科学合作网络、伙伴动态性与企业创新绩效［J］．科学学研究，2022，40（5）：906-914．

[70]

FONTI F, MAORET M. The direct and indirect effects of core and peripheral social capital on organizational performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(8): 1765-1786.

[71]

INKPEN A C, CURRALL S C. The coevolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(5): 586-599.

[72]

DAHLANDER L, MCFARLAND D A. Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2013, 58(1): 69-110.

[73]

SAUDER M, LYNN F, PODOLNY J M. Status: Insights from organizational sociology[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2012, 38(1): 267-283.

[74]

韩炜，姚博闻．组织间网络视角下地位研究的发展脉络与未来研究展望［J］．外国经济与管理，2020，42（5）：139-152．

[75]

AISENBREY S, FASANG A E. New life for old ideas: The "second wave" of sequence analysis bringing the "course" back into the life course[J]. Sociological Methods & Research, 2010, 38(3): 420-462.

[76]

KLEINBAUM A M. Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2012, 57(3): 407-452.

[77]

KUMAR P, ZAHEER A. Ego-network stability and innovation in alliances[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2019, 62(3): 691-716.

[78]

POWELL W W, KOPUT K W, SMITH-DOERR L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1): 116-145.

[79]

PARUCHURI S. Intraorganizational networks, interorganizational networks, and the impact of central inventors: A longitudinal study of pharmaceutical firms[J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21(1): 63-80.

[80]

唐清泉，巫岑．基于协同效应的企业内外部R&D与创新绩效研究［J］．管理科学，2014，27（5）：12-23．

[81]

INOUE H, SOUMA W, TAMADA S. Analysis of cooperative research and development networks on Japanese patents[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4(1): 89-96.

[82]

DEEDS D L, HILL C W. An examination of opportunistic action within research alliances: Evidence from the biotechnology industry[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 1999, 14(2): 141-163.

[83]

AHUJA G, MORRIS LAMPERT C. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(6/7): 521-543.

[84]

PHELPS C C. A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(4): 890-913.

[85]

ROSENKOPF L, MCGRATH P. Advancing the conceptualization and operationalization of novelty in organizational research[J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(5): 1297-1311.

[86]

ARTS S, VEUGELERS R. Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough invention[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2015, 24(6): 1215-1246.

[87]

孙笑明，马钰，王雅兰，等．专利数据在创新管理研究中的应用综述与展望［J］．科技进步与对策，2022，39（7）：150-160．

[88]

FUNK R J, OWEN-SMITH J. A dynamic network measure of technological change[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(3): 791-817.

[89]

GNYAWALI D R, MADHAVAN R. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26(3): 431-445.

[90]

QIAN G, LI L. Profitability of small- and medium-sized enterprises in high-tech industries: The case of the biotechnology industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(9): 881-887.

[91]

SØRENSEN J B, STUART T E. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45(1): 81-112.

[92]

ZACCHIA P. Benefiting colleagues but not the city: Localized effects from the relocation of superstar inventors[J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(5): 992-1005.

[93]

CHULUUN T, PREVOST A, UPADHYAY A. Firm network structure and innovation[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2017, 44: 193-214.

[94]

GONZALEZ-BRAMBILA C N, VELOSO F M, KRACKHARDT D. The impact of network embeddedness on research output[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(9): 1555-1567.

[95]

GRANOVETTER M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91(3): 481-510.

[96]

PETRUZZELLI A M. The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis[J]. Technovation, 2011, 31(7): 309-319.

[97]

WHITTINGTON K B, OWEN-SMITH J, POWELL W W. Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2009, 54(1): 90-122.

[98]

ZHENG Y, YANG H. Does familiarity foster innovation? The impact of alliance partner repeatedness on breakthrough innovations[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2015, 52(2): 213-230.

[99]

SUN Y, JIANG L, CAO C. Multiple proximities and inter-agency collaboration within a policy network: The case of innovation policymaking in China[J]. Technovation, 2025, 141: 103169.

[100]

SALANCIK G R. Structural holes: The social structure of competition[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(2): 345-350.

[101]

BRASS D J, GALASKIEWICZ J, GREVE H R, et al. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(6): 795-817.

[102]

GUAN J, ZHANG J, YAN Y. The impact of multilevel networks on innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(3): 545-559.

[103]

KLEINBERG J, SURI S, TARDOS É, et al. Strategic network formation with structural holes[C]//Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. New York: ACM, 2008.

[104]

袁红梅，田会静，刘心蕊，等．动态网络能力、技术融合能力对生物医药新产品开发绩效的影响——企业创新绩效的中介效应［J］．科技进步与对策，2024，41（18）：108-118．

[105]

GUAN J, YAN Y, ZHANG J J. The impact of collaboration and knowledge networks on citations[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2017, 11(2): 407-422.

[106]

WANG Y, YANG N, SHARIF S M F, et al. Technical environment matters: The effect of dynamic network capability on innovation based on a moderated mediation analysis[J]. Technovation, 2024, 138: 103116.

2026年第45卷第8期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.12404/j.issn.1002-980X.J26040312

接收时间：2026-04-03
首发时间：2026-10-28
出版时间：2026-08-25

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2026-04-03

基金

国家自然科学基金项目“基于间接知识泄露的创新网络防御研究”(72374200)

作者信息

中国人民大学商学院，北京 100872

通讯作者:

闫岩（1987—），博士，中国人民大学商学院副教授，研究方向：社会网络，创新管理；

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/jsyjj/CN/10.12404/j.issn.1002-980X.J26040312

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT