电源学报

基于组合赋权法的燃料电池客车动力总成综合性能评价

PDF下载

杨继斌中国电源学会会员 ¹^,²^,³ , 何宗虎 ¹^,³ , 徐晓惠 ¹^,²^,³ , 邓鹏毅 ¹^,²^,³

电源学报 | 电气化交通 2026,24(1): 271-279

收起

电源学报 |电气化交通 2026 , 24 (1) : 271 -279

基于组合赋权法的燃料电池客车动力总成综合性能评价

全屏

杨继斌中国电源学会会员¹^,²^,³, 何宗虎¹^,³, 徐晓惠¹^,²^,³, 邓鹏毅¹^,²^,³

作者信息

^1.西华大学汽车测控与安全四川省重点实验室，成都　610039

^2.四川省新能源汽车智能控制与仿真测试技术工程研究中心，成都　610039

^3.西华大学四川智能及新能源汽车产业学院，成都　610039

通讯作者:

杨继斌（1989—　），男，中国电源学会会员，通信作者，博士，副教授。研究方向：新能源车辆优化控制及测试评价。E-mail：yangjibin08@163.com。

作者简介:

何宗虎（1996—　），男，硕士研究生。研究方向：燃料电池技术。E-mail：1345959557@qq.com。

徐晓惠（1982—　），女，博士，教授。研究方向：复杂非线性系统的动态行为分析。E-mail：xhxu@163.com。

邓鹏毅（1972—　），男，硕士，副教授。研究方向：新能源汽车测试评价技术，汽车电子控制技术开发，新能源汽车动力及传动技术开发。E-mail：961499493@qq.com。

Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Fuel Cell Bus Powertrain Based on Combination Weighting Method

Jibin YANG Member, CPSS¹^,²^,³, Zonghu HE¹^,³, Xiaohui XU¹^,²^,³, Pengyi DENG¹^,²^,³

Affiliations

^1.Vehicle Measurement Control and Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China

^2.Provincial Engineering Research Center for New Energy Vehicle Intelligent Control and Simulation Test Technology of Sichuan, Chengdu 610039, China

^3.Sichuan Industrial School of Intelligent and New Energy Automobile, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China

出版时间: 2026-01-30 doi: 10.13234/j.issn.2095-2805.2026.1.271

文章导航

摘要

收起

为完善燃料电池客车测试评价技术体系，有效保障燃料电池客车的大规模推广应用，提出了1种将组合赋权法与主观打分方法相结合的燃料电池客车动力总成综合性能评价方法。首先，构建了燃料电池客车动力总成综合性能评价体系并给出各项指标的测试方法。然后，分别采用层次分析法和变异系数法确定评价指标主客观权重，并运用基于博弈论的组合赋权法得到综合权重。在此基础上，利用主观打分方法对待评价车辆的测试结果进行评分，最后与综合权重加权计算得到综合得分并进行评级。实例计算结果表明，融合了主、客观权重的综合权重克服了单一方法求取权重的局限性，使评价结果更加客观和准确，进而验证了评价体系和方法的科学性和合理性。

关键词

燃料电池客车 / 动力总成 / 组合赋权法 / 综合性能评价 / 博弈论

Abstract

收起

To improve the test and evaluation technology system for fuel cell buses and effectively ensure their widespread applications, a comprehensive performance evaluation method for the power train of fuel cell buses is proposed, which combines the combination weighting method and subjective scoring method. First, a comprehensive performance evaluation system for the powertrain of fuel cell buses is constructed, and the test methods for each index are given. Then, the analytic hierarchy process and coefficient of variation are used to determine the subjective and objective weights of evaluation indexes, and the combination weighting method based on the game theory is used to obtain the comprehensive weights. On this basis, the subjective scoring method is used to score the test results of vehicles to be evaluated. At last, the comprehensive scores are obtained by weighted calculation with the comprehensive weight, which are further rated. The calculation result of an example shows that the comprehensive weight combining the subjective and objective weights over-comes the limitation of calculating the weight by only one single method and makes the evaluation results more objective and accurate, thus verifying the scientific nature and rationality of the evaluation system and method.

Key words

Fuel cell bus / powertrain / combination weighting method / comprehensive performance evaluation / game theory

引用本文

杨继斌中国电源学会会员, 何宗虎, 徐晓惠, 邓鹏毅. 基于组合赋权法的燃料电池客车动力总成综合性能评价. 电源学报, 2026 , 24 (1) : 271 -279 . DOI: 10.13234/j.issn.2095-2805.2026.1.271

Jibin YANG, Zonghu HE, Xiaohui XU, Pengyi DENG. Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Fuel Cell Bus Powertrain Based on Combination Weighting Method[J]. Journal of Power Supply, 2026 , 24 (1) : 271 -279 . DOI: 10.13234/j.issn.2095-2805.2026.1.271

基金

收起

四川省科技计划资助项目(2023YFG0067; 2022YFG0092; 2023YFG0068)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

[1]

牛礼民, 杨洪源, 周亚洲, 等. 混合动力汽车动力总成多智能体集成控制策略[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(12): 168-177, 188. Niu Limin, Yang Hongyuan, Zhou Yazhou, et al. Hybrid electric vehicle integrated control strategy based on multi-agent[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(12): 168-177, 188. (in Chinese)

[2]

Tran M K, Akinsanya M, Panchal S, et al. Design of a hybrid electric vehicle powertrain for performance optimization considering various powertrain components and configurations[J]. Vehicles, 2021, 3(1): 20-32.

[3]

Nguyen C T, Walker P D, Zhang Nong, et al. Efficiency improvement of a novel dual motor powertrain for plug-in hybrid electric buses[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2020, 234(7): 1869-1882.

[4]

邵志刚, 衣宝廉. 氢能与燃料电池发展现状及展望[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(4): 469-477. Shao Zhigang, Yi Baolian. Developing trend and present status of hydrogen energy and fuel cell development[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, 34(4): 469-477. (in Chinese)

[5]

Chen Xi, Long Shichun, He Lingxuan, et al. Performance evaluation on thermodynamics-economy-environment of PEMFC vehicle power system under dynamic condition[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 269: 116082.

[6]

徐德鸿, 李海津, 李霄, 等. 燃料电池发电系统研究综述[J]. 电源学报, 2012, 10(6): 1-8. Xu Dehong, Li Haijin, Li Xiao, et al. Review on the fuel cell power system[J]. Journal of Power Supply, 2012, 10(6): 1-8. (in Chinese)

[7]

王贺武, 欧阳明高, 李建秋, 等. 中国氢燃料电池汽车技术路线选择与实践进展[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(2): 211-224. Wang Hewu, Ouyang Minggao, Li Jianqiu, et al. Hydro-gen fuel cell vehicle technology roadmap and progress in China[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(2): 211-224. (in Chinese)

[8]

徐鑫, 武小花, 杨佳珞, 等. 燃料电池客车模型预测控制能量管理策略[J]. 电源学报, 2025, 23(6): 309-319. Xu Xin, Wu Xiaohua, Yang Jialuo, et al. Model predicttive control-based energy management strategy for fuel cell buses[J]. Journal of Power Supply, 2025, 23(6): 309-319. (in Chinese)

[9]

Fathabadi H. Combining a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) stack with a Li-ion battery to supply the power needs of a hybrid electric vehicle[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 130: 714-724.

[10]

Hua T, Ahluwalia R, Eudy L, et al. Status of hydrogen fuel cell electric buses worldwide[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 269: 975-993.

[11]

Zhou Xingyu, Qin Datong, Hu Jianjun. Multi-objective optimization design and performance evaluation for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle powertrains[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 208: 1608-1625.

[12]

倪计民, 单炯毅, 叶淑英. 轻型车动力总成综合性能评价体系的构建[J]. 汽车技术, 2006(3): 30-34. Ni Jimin, Shan Jiongyi, Ye Shuying. Construction of the evaluation system of the combined performance of the power train of light duty trucks[J]. Automobile Technology, 2006(3): 30-34. (in Chinese)

[13]

Song Ke, Chen Huan, Wen Peimin, et al. A comprehensive evaluation framework to evaluate energy management strategies of fuel cell electric vehicles[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 292: 960-973.

[14]

Liu Mengfei, Ouyang Xinyu, Lu Ruikai, et al. An evaluation method for automotive technical and comprehensive performance[J]. Automotive Innovation, 2023, 6(2): 231-243.

[15]

Jiang Kang, Luo Ziqiang, Feng Zhongxiang, et al. Subjective evaluation of automobile power performance based on RA-AHP[J]. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2018, 20(3): 413-424.

[16]

张建, 夏烈, 徐亮辉, 等. 基于最小鉴别信息组合赋权法的光伏发电单元综合评价技术研究[J]. 电源学报, 2025, 23(5): 152-160. Zhang Jian, Xia Lie, Xu Lianghui, et al. Research on comprehensive evaluation technology for photovoltaic power generation unit based on combined weighting method of minimum discriminant information[J]. Journal of Power Supply, 2025, 23(5): 152-160. (in Chinese)

[17]

Zhang Xinfeng, Ding Chen, Zhang Tong. A hierarchical model for automotive PEM fuel cell system comprehensive evaluation and comparison[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(3): 1476-1484.

[18]

樊东方, 罗凯, 靳志宏. 基于变异系数法的社会物流成本聚合指标构建[J]. 公路交通科技, 2023, 40(1): 245-251. Fan Dongfang, Luo Kai, Jin Zhihong. Construction of social logistics cost aggregation indicator based on variation coefficient method[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2023, 40(1): 245-251. (in Chinese)

[19]

陆键, 刘禹杰, 马晓丽. 基于博弈论的危险品运输网络选线[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(4): 322-329. Lu Jian, Liu Yujie, Ma Xiaoli. Game-theory-based hazardous materials transport network routing[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(4): 322-329. (in Chinese)

[20]

Liu Tianyu, Deng Yong, Chan F. Evidential supplier selection based on DEMATEL and game theory[J]. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 20(4): 1321-1333.

2026年第24卷第1期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.13234/j.issn.2095-2805.2026.1.271

接收时间：2023-06-27
首发时间：2026-10-26
出版时间：2026-01-30

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2023-06-27
修回日期：2023-08-12
录用日期：2023-08-23

基金

Science & Technology Project of Sichuan Province(2023YFG0067; 2022YFG0092; 2023YFG0068)

四川省科技计划资助项目(2023YFG0067; 2022YFG0092; 2023YFG0068)

作者信息

^1.西华大学汽车测控与安全四川省重点实验室，成都　610039

^2.四川省新能源汽车智能控制与仿真测试技术工程研究中心，成都　610039

^3.西华大学四川智能及新能源汽车产业学院，成都　610039

通讯作者:

杨继斌（1989—　），男，中国电源学会会员，通信作者，博士，副教授。研究方向：新能源车辆优化控制及测试评价。E-mail：yangjibin08@163.com。

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/dyxb/CN/10.13234/j.issn.2095-2805.2026.1.271

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT