草地学报

本土和入侵植物应对水分和营养亏缺的根系性状变异研究

PDF下载

草地学报 | 研究论文 2026,34(8): 2933-2945

收起

草地学报 |研究论文 2026 , 34 (8) : 2933 -2945

本土和入侵植物应对水分和营养亏缺的根系性状变异研究

全屏

李文娆¹, 贾志慧¹, 王焕芳², 孔欣云¹, 毕东申¹, 张彤¹

作者信息

作者简介:

李文娆(1980-),女,汉族,内蒙古通辽人,博士,教授,主要从事植物根系逆境生物学方面研究,E-mail:wrli2007@henu.edu.cn

Study on Root Trait Variations of Native and Invasive Plants in Response to Water and Nutrient Deficiency

LI Wen-rao¹, JIA Zhi-hui¹, WANG Huan-fang², KONG Xin-yun¹, BI Dong-shen¹, ZHANG Tong¹

Affiliations

doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.08.017

文章导航

摘要

收起

为探究入侵与本地近缘植物对水分和营养胁迫的根系适应机制，本研究比较了入侵植物欧洲千里光（Senecio vulgaris）、钻叶紫菀（Symphyotrichum subulatum）和本地植物千里光（Senecio scandens）、三脉紫菀（Aster ageratoides）的根系形态、丛枝菌根真菌（Arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi，AMF）侵染率及生物量等指标的差异，结果显示：水分和营养胁迫均使两类植物地上生物量和AMF侵染率下降超20%，但入侵植物仍保持显著更高的地上生物量与AMF侵染率。营养亏缺下，本地植物比根长、比根表面积及细根根长显著增加，根组织密度降低，变幅为8.23%~32.64%，而入侵植物变化不显著或呈相反趋势。水分亏缺普遍促进两类植物性状优化。综上，应对营养亏缺，入侵植物依赖高AMF侵染，本地植物则以根系形态调整为主；水分亏缺下两者根系策略相似，但入侵植物AMF侵染率更高；耦合胁迫响应类似于营养单胁迫。该研究揭示了入侵物种在资源胁迫下的适应机制，为解析其入侵性提供了依据。

关键词

入侵植物 / 水分亏缺 / 营养亏缺 / AMF / 根系形态特征

Abstract

收起

The mechanisms by which the root systems of invasive plants respond to nutrient and water deficiency remain poorly understood.In this study， we conducted a paired comparison between Asteraceae invasive plants （Senecio vulgaris， Symphyotrichum subulatum） and native plants （Senecio scandens， Aster ageratoides）， examined their root traits， Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Fungi （AMF） colonization rate， and biomass performance under normal and water and nutrient deficient conditions. The results showed that although both water and nutrient deficiencies reduced aboveground biomass and AMF colonization rates by more than 20% on average across all species， the invasive plants exhibited significantly greater aboveground biomass and higher AMF colonization rates compared to native plants. Nutrient deficiency significantly increased specific root length and specific root surface area， promoted root length and surface area of roots with diameters <0.5 mm， and reduced root tissue density in native plants， with average changes ranging from 8.23% to 32.64% in native plants. However， invasive plants showed opposite or no significant changes. With the exception of Symphyotrichum subulatum， water deficiency enhanced specific root length， specific root surface area， root length and surface area across all diameter classes， while reducing root tissue density in the other species. In summary， the invasive plants demonstrated stronger stress resistance. Under nutrient stress， invasive plants relied more on maintaining high AMF colonization， whereas native plants primarily depended on adjustments in root morphology. Under water deficiency， both invasive and native plants exhibited similar root adaptation strategies， but the invasive plants maintained higher AMF colonization. Combined stress responses tended to resemble those under single nutrient deficiency. These findings are important for elucidating the mechanisms underlying the adaptation of invasive plants to nutrient- and water-deficient environments.

Key words

Invasive plants / Water deficit / Nutrient deficiency / Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi / Root morphological traits

引用本文

李文娆, 贾志慧, 王焕芳, 孔欣云, 毕东申, 张彤. 本土和入侵植物应对水分和营养亏缺的根系性状变异研究. 草地学报, 2026 , 34 (8) : 2933 -2945 . DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.08.017

LI Wen-rao, JIA Zhi-hui, WANG Huan-fang, KONG Xin-yun, BI Dong-shen, ZHANG Tong. Study on Root Trait Variations of Native and Invasive Plants in Response to Water and Nutrient Deficiency[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026 , 34 (8) : 2933 -2945 . DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.08.017

基金

收起

河南省自然科学基金 (252300421404); 河南省教师教育课程改革研究项目 (2025-JSJYZD-003); 河南大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目 (XJ2024223,XJ2025110)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

LIU Y J，HUANG W，YANG Q，et al. Research advances of plant invasion ecology over the past 10 years[J]. Biodiversity Science，2022，30（10）：276-292刘艳杰，黄伟，杨强，等. 近十年植物入侵生态学重要研究进展[J]. 生物多样性，2022，30（10）：276-292
ODUOR A M O，YU H，LIU Y J. Invasive plant species support each other’s growth in low-nutrient conditions but compete when nutrients are abundant[J]. Ecology，2024，105（10）：e4401
VAN KLEUNEN M，WEBER E，FISCHER M. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species[J]. Ecology Letters，2010，13（2）：235-245
DAWSON W，BURSLEM D F R P，HULME P E. The comparative importance of species traits and introduction characteristics in tropical plant invasions[J]. Diversity and Distributions，2011，17（6）：1111-1121
FUNK J L，VITOUSEK P M. Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems[J]. Nature，2007，446（7139）：1079-1081
BRAASCH J E，HASMAN M S，DLUGOSCH K M. Differences between introduced and native grassland species revealed by responses to prolonged drought[J]. Biological Invasions，2025，27（6）：134
LEISHMAN M R，HASLEHURST T，ARES A，et al. Leaf trait relationships of native and invasive plants： community- and global-scale comparisons[J]. New Phytologist，2007，176（3）：635-643
MAILLOUX G A，CHIKOMO M，FAN Y. Where do we expect to find deep plant roots [J]. Ecography，2025（10）：e08034
WANG G L，FAHEY T J，XUE S，et al. Root morphology and architecture respond to N addition in Pinus tabuliformis，west China[J]. Oecologia，2013，171（2）：583-590
GUPTA A，RICO-MEDINA A，CAÑO-DELGADO A I. The physiology of plant responses to drought[J]. Science，2020，368（6488）：266-269
CAPLAN J S，MEINERS S J，FLORES-MORENO H，et al. Fine-root traits are linked to species dynamics in a successional plant community[J]. Ecology，2019，100（3）：e02588
LI W R，WANG L W，QIAN S F，et al. Root characteristics explain greater water use efficiency and drought tolerance in invasive Compositae plants[J]. Plant and Soil，2023，483（1）：209-223
FAHAD S，BAJWA A A，NAZIR U，et al. Crop production under drought and heat stress： plant responses and management options[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science， 2017，8：1147
LIU S X，MA A F，QIN F，et al. Research advances in plant drought resistance[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin，2025，70（25）：4297-4314刘升学，马爱芳，秦峰，等. 植物抗旱性研究进展[J]. 科学通报，2025，70（25）：4297-4314
CHEN G T，ZHENG J，PENG T C，et al. Fine root morphology and chemistry characteristics in different branch orders of Castanopsis platyacantha and their responses to nitrogen addition[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2017，28（11）：3461-3468陈冠陶，郑军，彭天驰，等. 扁刺栲不同根序细根形态和化学特征及其对短期氮添加的响应[J]. 应用生态学报，2017，28（11）：3461-3468
STRULLU-DERRIEN C，SELOSSE M A，KENRICK P，et al. The origin and evolution of mycorrhizal symbioses： from palaeomycology to phylogenomics[J]. New Phytologist，2018，220（4）：1012-1030
ZHANG Z F，ZHANG J C，XU G P，et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve the growth and drought tolerance of Zenia insignis seedlings under drought stress[J]. New Forests，2019，50（4）：593-604
ZHANG L，XU M G，LIU Y，et al. Carbon and phosphorus exchange may enable cooperation between an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a phosphate-solubilizing bacterium[J]. New Phytologist，2016，210（3）：1022-1032
LIU M J，LU X Y，WEN Z，et al. Effects of different fFertilization and inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth of passion fruit seedlings[J]. Tropical Agricultural Engineering，2025，49（5）：1-6刘明洁，卢星谕，文壮，等. 不同施肥和接种丛枝菌根真菌对百香果幼苗生长的影响[J].热带农业工程，2025，49（5）：1-6
TIAN Z S，CHENG D D，XU L，et al. Preliminary investigation on invasion situation of Senecio vulgaris L.（Asteraceae） in China[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering，2018，25（2）：7-14田忠赛，程丹丹，徐琳，等. 欧洲千里光在中国入侵状况的初步调查[J]. 安全与环境工程，2018，25（2）：7-14
LI J Y，CHEN Y T，GUO Y Q，et al. Potential suitable areas of Symphyotrichum subulatum based on MaxEnt under future climate scenarios[J]. Plant Protection，2023，49（2）：92-102李建宇，陈燕婷，郭燕青，等. 基于MaxEnt预测未来气候条件下钻叶紫菀在中国的潜在适生区[J]. 植物保护，2023，49（2）：92-102
NIJJER S，ROGERS W E， SIEMANN E. Trypan blue dye is an effective and inexpensive stain for detection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi[J]. Plant and Soil，2008，317（1-2）：311-314
TARDIEU F，PARENT B，CALDEIRA C F，et al. Genetic and physiological controls of growth under water deficit[J]. Plant Physiology，2014，164（4）：1628-1635
PARK D J，YONG S H，KIM D，et al. Assessment of drought-heat dual stress tolerance in woody plants and selection of stress-tolerant species[J]. Life-Basel，2025，15（8）：1207
VALLIERE J M，ESCOBEDO E B，BUCCIARELLI G M，et al. Invasive annuals respond more negatively to drought than native species[J]. New Phytologist，2019，223（3）：1647-1656
ZHANG X，ODUOR A M O，LIU Y J. Invasive plants have greater growth than co-occurring natives in live soil subjected to a drought-rewetting treatment[J]. Functional Ecology，2023，37（3）：513-522
ZHAO Y，WU M，DENG P，et al. Effects of drought and rewatering on growth and physiology characteristics of Wedelia chinensis and Wedelia trilobata[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University （Natural Science Edition），2021，49（4）：113-122赵英，吴敏，邓平，等. 干旱与复水对2种蟛蜞菊生长及生理生化特性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报（自然科学版），2021，49（4）：113-122
TIAN B L，PEI Y C，HUANG W，et al. Increasing flavonoid concentrations in root exudates enhance associations between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and an invasive plant[J]. The ISME Journal，2021，15（7）：1919-1930
YU H W，HE Y Y，ZHANG W，et al. Greater chemical signaling in root exudates enhances soil mutualistic associations in invasive plants compared to natives[J]. New Phytologist，2022，236（3）：1140-1153
DING L，MILHIET T，PARENT B，et al. The plasma membrane aquaporin ZmPIP25 enhances the sensitivity of stomatal closure to water deficit[J]. Plant，Cell & Environment，2022，45（4）：1146-1156
HSU P K，DUBEAUX G，TAKAHASHI Y，et al. Signaling mechanisms in abscisic acid-mediated stomatal closure[J]. The Plant Journal，2021，105（2）：307-321
CHANG M L， LIAO L J， LIN J H， et al. Modulation of antioxidant defense system and NADPH oxidase in Pluchea indica leaves by water deficit stress[J]. Botanical Studies，2012， 53（1）： 45-54
PINTÓ-MARIJUAN M，COTADO A，FLETA-SORIANO E，et al. Drought stress memory in the photosynthetic mechanisms of an invasive CAM species，Aptenia cordifolia[J]. Photosynthesis Research，2017，131（3）：241-253
OLIVEIRA M T，MEDEIROS C D，FROSI G，et al. Different mechanisms drive the performance of native and invasive woody species in response to leaf phosphorus supply during periods of drought stress and recovery[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry，2014，82：66-75

2026年第34卷第8期

PDF下载

106

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.08.017

接收时间：2025-09-24
首发时间：2026-09-23

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2025-09-24
修回日期：2025-11-26

基金

作者信息

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.08.017

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT